首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of the immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 vaccine and the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine for oncogenic non-vaccine types HPV-31 and HPV-45 in healthy women aged 18–45 years
【2h】

Comparison of the immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 vaccine and the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine for oncogenic non-vaccine types HPV-31 and HPV-45 in healthy women aged 18–45 years

机译:人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-16/18疫苗和HPV-6 / 11/16/18疫苗对18-45岁健康女性非致癌型HPV-31和HPV-45疫苗的免疫原性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Protection against oncogenic non-vaccine types (cross-protection) offered by human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines may provide a significant medical benefit. Available clinical efficacy data suggest the two licensed vaccines [HPV-16/18 vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (GSK), and HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine, Merck and Co., Inc.,] differ in terms of protection against oncogenic non-vaccine HPV types -31/45. The immune responses induced by the two vaccines against these two non-vaccine HPV types (cross-reactivity) was compared in an observer-blind study up to Month 24 (18 mo postvaccination), in women HPV DNA-negative and seronegative prior to vaccination for the HPV type analyzed [HPV-010 (NCT00423046)]. Geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs) measured by pseudovirion-based neutralization assay (PBNA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA ) were similar between vaccines for HPV-31/45. Seropositivity rates for HPV-31 were also similar between vaccines; however, there was a trend for higher seropositivity with the HPV-16/18 vaccine (13.0–16.7%) vs. the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine (0.0–5.0%) for HPV-45 with PBNA, but not ELISA . HPV-31/45 cross-reactive memory B-cell responses were comparable between vaccines. Circulating antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell frequencies were higher for the HPV-16/18 vaccine than the HPV-6/11/16/18 vaccine {HPV-31 [geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 2.0; p = 0.0002] and HPV-45 [GMR = 2.6; p = 0.0092]}, as were the proportion of T-cell responders (HPV-31, p = 0.0009; HPV-45, p = 0.0793). In conclusion, immune response to oncogenic non-vaccine HPV types -31/45 was generally similar for both vaccines with the exception of T-cell response which was higher with the HPV-16/18 vaccine. Considering the differences in cross-protective efficacy between the two vaccines, the results might provide insights into the underlying mechanism(s) of protection.
机译:针对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗提供的针对致癌性非疫苗类型的保护(交叉保护)可能会提供重大的医学益处。现有的临床疗效数据表明,两种获得许可的疫苗[HPV-16 / 18疫苗,葛兰素史克生物学(GSK)和HPV-6 / 11/16/18疫苗,默克公司]在预防方面有所不同致癌性非疫苗HPV类型-31/45。直到24个月(疫苗接种后18个月),在女性HPV DNA阴性和血清阴性的女性中,比较了这两种疫苗针对这两种非疫苗HPV类型(交叉反应性)诱导的免疫反应(交叉反应)。用于分析的HPV类型[HPV-010(NCT00423046)]。在HPV-31 / 45疫苗之间,通过基于假病毒颗粒的中和测定(PBNA)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测量的几何平均抗体滴度(GMT)相似。疫苗之间HPV-31的血清阳性率也相似。但是,与带有PBNA的HPV-45相比,HPV-16 / 18疫苗(13.0–16.7%)的血清阳性率有增加的趋势,而HPV-6 / 11/16/18疫苗(0.0–5.0%)有更高的血清阳性率。不是ELISA。疫苗之间的HPV-31 / 45交叉反应记忆B细胞反应相当。 HPV-16 / 18疫苗的循环抗原特异性CD4 + T细胞频率高于HPV-6 / 11/16/18疫苗(HPV-31 [几何平均比率(GMR)= 2.0; p = 0.0002]和HPV-45 [GMR = 2.6; p = 0.0092]},以及T细胞应答者的比例(HPV-31,p = 0.0009; HPV-45,p = 0.0793)。总之,两种疫苗对致癌性非疫苗型HPV -31/45的免疫反应通常相似,但T细胞反应除外,其中HPV-16 / 18疫苗的T细胞反应更高。考虑到两种疫苗在交叉保护功效上的差异,结果可能提供对潜在保护机制的见解。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号